![]() But again mostly Serifs fault because their software has so few vector features. It is another conversion (to PDF or SVG) just via the clipboard. But I guess Serif is okay with Sending objects back and forth only makes sense when they are simple - when I am half way through a complex design in Affinity is not carried beautifully or identically over to VS or anything else. It is pointless and is a reoccuring accumulating loss of time. But I curse them when I have to move content back and forth between programs to alter it. So like you I use several tools but I always share my thoughts on how to improve them with the companies behind. And I pay what they cost to reach my goals. I have the Adobe CC Creative Suite and Affinity Designer and Photo for some bitmap oriented designs. Personally I never could make the A or B choice. Knowing why some of the details matter so much to people is important. In Affinity Serif was ignorant enough to leave out the hairline width so their otherwise excellent pen tool is not great when you need cutters of some sort. I did not post this comparison to make an A vs B comparison (that fanboys on the Affinity forum would "discuss" like kids in a school yard forever) but because I like to see other peoples opinions about how they actually work. With a bit of usability experts and performance focus they could head Inkscape directly towards glory. But some implementations of tools and options are fine in Inkscape. I am impressed by the featureset and used it for hobby work for years but is unbearable to use usability wise and performance wise. What I found interesting about the video was the insights and compariosons of the tools, how they were implemented.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |